EB1A Insights Dashboard

Explore data-driven insights from our analysis of 4,500+ EB1A Administrative Appeals Office decisions.

Key Findings from 4,500+ Cases

Our analysis reveals that while EB1A petitions have a high initial dismissal rate, understanding common patterns and preparing strong evidence across multiple criteria significantly improves success chances.

Case Overview

Analysis of outcomes across all 4,500+ AAO decisions

Key Insights from Word Cloud Analysis

Our analysis of 4,500+ AAO decisions reveals clear patterns in successful and unsuccessful petitions. These insights can help guide your application strategy.

Success Pattern:

Successful petitioners consistently demonstrate significant contributions to their field with strong evidence of recognition at the national or international level.

Failure Pattern:

Denied cases often show a lack of evidence or failed attempts to demonstrate the significance of contributions to the field.

Success Patterns

Word cloud showing common reasons for approved EB1A cases

Key Success Factors:

Strong Field Recognition - Establishing your standing in your field with clear evidence
Significant Contributions - Demonstrating meaningful impact with measurable outcomes
Quality Documentation - Providing comprehensive, objective evidence for each criterion
External Validation - Recognition from independent sources outside your organization

Denial Patterns

Word cloud showing common reasons for denied EB1A cases

Common Pitfalls:

Insufficient Evidence - Lacking comprehensive documentation for claimed criteria
Failed Demonstration - Unable to prove claims with objective evidence
Significance Issues - Not establishing the importance of contributions to the field
Limited Recognition - Recognition confined to local or regional levels rather than national/international

Strategic Approach

Focus on Quality Over Quantity
Strong evidence for 3-4 criteria is better than weak evidence for many.
Prioritize Independent Evidence
Third-party recognition carries more weight than self-promotion.
Demonstrate National/International Impact
Evidence must show recognition beyond local or regional levels.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Inadequate Documentation
61% of denials result from insufficient evidence for claimed criteria.
Misinterpreting Criteria Requirements
Claiming criteria without meeting the specific standards USCIS requires.
Failing to Demonstrate Significance
Not clearly showing how your work has substantially impacted your field.